Utah Judge allows lawsuit to protect Great Salt Lake to move forward

Signs of drought at the Great Salt Lake. Photo: TownLift // Kevin Cody.

SALT LAKE CITY, Utah — A Utah judge has ruled that a major lawsuit against the state over its failure to protect the Great Salt Lake can proceed, despite state officials’ objections. The lawsuit argues that Utah has a legal duty to ensure enough water flows into the lake to prevent environmental disaster.

Judge Laura Scott rejected the state’s argument that it has no obligation to protect the lake’s water. Conservation and community groups applauded the decision, calling it a crucial step toward holding the state accountable.

“This ruling forces Utah to take responsibility for protecting the Great Salt Lake, rather than just relying on marketing and empty promises,” said Zach Frankel, director of the Utah Rivers Council.

The lawsuit, filed in 2023, claims excessive water use upstream has caused the lake to shrink dramatically, threatening millions of birds and exposing toxic dust that harms nearby communities. Experts warn that continued decline would worsen air pollution and put public health at risk.

“This decision gives the Great Salt Lake a fighting chance,” said Deeda Seed of the Center for Biological Diversity. “The lake is still in crisis, but now we have an opportunity to push for real solutions.”

A recent study found that human water use has diverted 62% of the water that would have naturally replenished the lake. Experts recommend reducing water consumption by 35% to begin restoring it.

The lawsuit is backed by several environmental organizations, including Earthjustice, Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment, and the Sierra Club. They say the ruling brings hope that Utah will finally be held accountable for safeguarding one of its most critical natural resources.